Curbing the Menace of Queue-Jumpers
August 24th, 2010 / Author: admin
As an immigration law practitioner, I represent diverse communities, but the deferential treatment given by the Canadian government to the presentrefugee claimantswho came on the MV Sun Sea is bizarre.
In Canada’s immigration process, our clients have to fight every step of the way to obtain proper status and, if needed, to appeals when a claim is denied. It can take several years to exhaust the lengthy process from the point of first contact with Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
The federal government knew if the ship was allowed to dock that the migrants would jump the queue. The migrants also were aware of the relative laxity of the immigration system; indeed, in the history of Canada, few persons have been deported.
This particular group of claimants seeks to exploit a lacuna in Canadian immigration law, at the expense of equally vulnerable and worthy migrants who (perhaps unadvisedly) follow the rules, and wait years abroad to find out whether or not they may legally immigrate to Canada one by one.
I am acquainted with several refugee claimants who have not seen their children for a decade, while they patiently wait outside Canada for decisions on their files.
I sympathize with genuine refugees in need of immediate shelter and protection, but attempts such as this to overwhelm with the immediacy of sheer numbers (many of whom would otherwise be directed to make an ordinary application) do a real injustice to those who would diligently obey the rules.
Our need to maintain a fair and efficient immigration policy should be paramount, and it is the obligation of the ruling Canadian government to enforce law to curb this menace.
As published in the Ottawa Citizen, Aug. 24, 2010

These changes have been made on the policy grounds of making Canada a more competitive player in the global investor immigration ‘market;’ according to CIC analysis, the current threshold – established in 1999 and not indexed to inflation – has resulted in Canada receiving a disproportionate amount of applications, compared to similar nations such as the United States, Australia, the UK, and New Zealand. The high rate of applications has in recent years created a backlog that now results in an approximately five-year waiting period for a final application decision, compared to 23-35 months only three years ago. The Government of Canada is not willing to increase funding levels merely to address this backlog, nor is CIC able to reallocate resources away from other immigration categories.